| Corruption.
That is our original sin—a
generation being born into a culture of corruption, a generation growing
up in a culture of kotong, kurakot at kickback, lagayan at areglo, and
a generation who grew up in it, aging in it, most of them having given
up hope, or in hoping, believe that change won't come in their lifetime,
leaving behind a legacy of corruption and the burden of change.
| |
Ang
ating bagong KKK: Kotong, kickback at kurakot.
They sell
their votes saying: Maski naman sino ang manalo, ganoon din, e
di kunin na iyong bigas.
Of course
greed is part of the human condition. Pero ang corruption dito
naiiba, garapal at walang awa. Politicians ruthlessly plunder
the governments's coffer. Bago umabot sa infrastructure, health
care, education,nabawasan na ng 40% o mahigit.
A
man of the cloth said on a TV interview: For every peso sa kaban
ng bayan, 65 to 70 centavos, kinukurakot. Totoo ba iyon?
Where is
our outrage? There might have been more ranting and raving against
an American comedy show's one-line "slur" that impugned
the integrity of our medical profession.
Asked someone
voted into office: Ano ang mga programa
mo? Malinis ba? He answered with a smile: Babawiin
muna.

A young man
despaired: All my friends have gone. I talked to one before he
left. He said, there is nothing left for me in this country. There
is nothing it can give me. I started talking about "passion."
Grabbed at the moment for that famous quote: Ask
not what your country can do for you but what you can do for your
country. . . But it seemed so corny and hackneyed.
The new
colonizers
Siempre, maski na papano, palaging sisisihin ang mga dating colonizers.
Mga kastila. Mga kano. Bakit
hindi ituro ang mga bagong colonizers. Iyong pumalit sa kano at
kastila. Iyong mga burgis.
Mga neo-illustrados.
Mga corrupt trapos.
Mga bagong singkit na colonizers.
They have all conquered the economy from alliances forged within.
".
. . sa manlulupig, di ka pasisiil. . . " . . . ?
Where is
the honor? Where is the shame? Politician A, known for his ruthless
and plunderous ways, looks politician B in the eye and censures
him for his dishonest ways.
We
hear it again and again. Wala namang ipapalit.
It will be just a continuation of the same kind of corrupted governance.
The choice will be between the lesser evil or the familiar evil.
THE QUESTION WAS ASKED AFTEN ERAP'S
PLUNDER CONVICITION.SA TALAGA, IN THE DEFINITION OF
"PLUNDER," SINO ANG MASASABI NATING HINDI GUILTY?
ANG SAGOT, HINDI PA MAGAMIT ANG SAPUNG DALIRI NANG DALAWANG KAMAY:
Tañada, Diokno, Pelaez, Salonga,
Joker Arroyo. ISANG KAMAY PA LANG IYAN. Sagisag?
Sino pa? . .
A game-show host
thanks her guest, Erap Estrada, for participating as a contestant.
Then adds: . . . how great a respect she has for the office of
the presidency.
The Marcos regime, defined as
a "Kleptocracy," the rule by thieves in political power,
earned a Guiness title in the 80s as "the most corrupt government
of all time.
Many believe graft and corruption
have gotten worse, and perhaps, if anything has improved, it is
that the corrupt machinations have gotten more sophisticated.
A friend said: Not in our lifetime.
. . then added: Ang problema, mas corrupt ang kabataan ngayon.
Many
don't pay taxes, alam nila, kukurakutin rin. Ang collected VAT,
how much of that goes to plunder and graft?
The amount
lost to graft and corruption continues to be staggering. Since
1988, an estimated 100 billion USD have been lost to corruption,
and continues at 100 million pesos daily or 940 million USD annually.
To
that amount, try adding uncollected taxes.
It is a painful exercise when one tries to imagine how these proceeds
of graft and corruption would otherwise contribute to education,
health care, and economic opportunities.
After all that, enough
left to buy polish to put the shine back on the "pearl of
the orient."
|
We
live in a system of institutionalized corruption, where politicians
seek office for the power and the plunder, without honor and shame,
bulimic
in their bottomless greed, where the culture of dishonesty has trickled
down and seeped into the seams and fabric of our existence—from
the sophisticated machinations of government, to the sack of rice that
buys the vote and feeds the hunger for a few days, from the greasing
and wheeling-dealing of the influence
peddlers in high office to the expediting
and facilitating by the expectant
municipal counter-worker, all working for their windfalls, under the
cover of political office and guise of public service.
A rural village
I frequent is a microcosm of this affliction — recurring scenario
of blatant thievery and dishonesty, with clones of robin hoods, stealing
in the name of hunger and need, justifying or minimizing their thieving
and dishonesty with: LAHAT NAMAN SO GOBIERNO NAGNANAKAW,
PAYAMAN NG PAYAMAN. . . PAANO KAMI NAIBA? AT KAMI NAGNANAKAW DAHIL SO
GUTOM AT KAHIRAPAN. ANG MGA POLITICO, GANID, WALANG KATAPUSAN ANG PAGNANAKAW
AT PAGPAPAYAMAN. How do you talk
to them about honor and shame? For indeed, everyday we watch, read and
listen to the same stories, of politicians and public servants in their
reality shows of corruption and dishonesty, with their colleagues on
the sidelines emoting in their oscar-winning performances of feigned
indignation and condemnation at such moral depravity in their political
houses, the present object of finger-pointing so thankful and relieved
when someone new is brought up for chastisement and censure.
And we watch, read
and listen, our anger and angst desensitized to the recurring scenarios
in this wasteland of corruption, our social lamentations leading to
the same questions: Why are we so corrupt?
Ano ang nangyari sa
atin? Bakit tayo nagkaganito? Saan nagumpisa?
And we line up the usual suspects: Mga kastila, mga intsik, mga kano.
Or did it start with a postwar president with his Golden Arinola? Or
Plaza Miranda? Or, with Marcos? And all those who came after him?
After the
usual suspects, we have to deal with the comic contradiction of corruption
in this bastion of Catholicism in Asia, a country seemingly awash in
religion, endlessly celebrating saints, Santo Niños and the Virgin.
Is it the easy sacramental cleansing— repentance, confession and
communion—that allows the ephemeral grace of God on weekends and
the ravenous plunder on weekdays?
Lahat ating
sinisisi. Pero gasgas na iyon. Sa totoo, lahat tayo may kasalanan. We
allowed it to happen—decades
of apathy and inaction,
allowing the seeds of corruption to sprout and spread. Afflicted with
amnesia, we keep voting the same group of people into office. And in
the very instrument of "elections," the politicians have found
the easy way of perpetuating themselves in their Grail of power and
plunder. The checks and balances are gone, replaced by spin, denial,
rhetoric and political whitewash. And through indifference and inaction,
we enabled corruption.
Yes,
we allowed it to happen—the comedy show of predictably fraudulent
elections and the machinations of corruption perpetuated by nepotism
and cronyism implanted and embedded into the political system. Collectively
afflicted with inertia, we chose to look to other way, hopeful that
prayers and miracles, a deus ex machina or a mythic hero will rescue
us from this corrupt political wasteland.
Some say there
is a collective failure of the Filipino's psyche—a complex of
timidity and subservience to the rich and powerful, the "indionization"
of our spirit, the "bahala na" or "bahala na ang Diyos"
that rules the lives of many. There is nothing that truly holds the
7,000 islands together, that are separated not just by waters, but worse,
by rabid, repressive and sometimes, hostile regionalism. Few deeply
care about the suffering and turmoil in the south, not enough care about
the suffering of the poor. We might sigh enough, but so few do little,
if any all. Where will we find the collective will that can run the
machinery of change?
Edsa
86 brought hope. I thought: wow! A true people's revolution. Alas, in
the end, a miracle attributed to the Virgin, while the turncoats stumbled
into each other as they declared themselves heroes of the revolution
and warriors of change.
Akala natin
si Marcos ang problema. Hindi pala. Ano ang nagbago? Patuloy pa rin
ang paghihirap ng tao.
After
EDSA, we continued to hope—an arrogant hope. I was told the winds
of change were blowing, our generation of Archers and Eagles and Lions
and dens filled with smoldering activists were lying in wait - waiting
for another convergence of social elements and ingredients - to bring
about the change.
But nothing happened.
The winds of change died down. Since then, burdened by a country that
held little promise for a future, many have left in search of greener
pastures, for a future with possibilities.
. . and the exodus and diasporas continue.
In the interim,
we have become more corrupt. The new colonizers have established their
separate empires. And
the divide between the rich and poor continues to widen.
The
plight of the poor are presented to us in five-minute media news sound
bites, in blogs, in u-tube videos, each with its consequent knee-jerk
response of compassion and concern:
Is this true? Totoo ba ito? Ganyan bang
kahirap ang mga Pilipino?
We have doses of that, recurrent doses of collective angst.
But it wears off fast. The blinders are put on again. And in-between,
the poor are usually invisible, the stark and cruel graphics of their
existence have long ago ceased to touch us. The slums and shanties that
collars around the burgis and gated communities. The young mother with
her infant splayed in her arms, baking in the noonday sun, waiting for
the light to turn red, for their minute of begging, knocking on our
dark tinted windows that shields the anonymity of our unconcern. The
children hawking stringed sampaguitas, innocence long gone, many inevitable
into commerce of flesh. The father with the sleeping child tied to his
back, his garbage bags in tow, digging through Christmas day rubble.
Families feeding off "pagpag" meals or climbing their small
mountains to dig into them for their livelihoods. There are a thousand
and one such sights and stories, every day, anywhere, in Anytown, Philippines.
Where is our outrage?
Once,
I was awed by the fearlessness of the media's pen and voice, charmed
and challenged by the rhetoric. Editorials that spoke for the suffering
masses, that exposed the machinations of government, that declared a
"war on poverty and corruption," that called for "moral
ascendancy" and the passionanate demand for "good governance"
and the return of honor and shame, the demand for transparency–all
inspiring slogans and catchwords that fueled the hopes and possibility
for change.
Ang
titinik, ang tatapang, I thought.
With pens like these, who
needs the sword.
But mostly, nothing happened. The stories
brought no outrage. Or if it did, it quietly fizzled or was elbowed
out by a juicy piece of celebrity gossip or a fresher snippet of political
scandal.
And I wondered,
Who read? Who listened? And, who cared?
The rich, walled off in their gated-communities and vacationing in the
green pastures of the common man's impossible dream, many enriching
themselves from the pork and plunder of politics? The middle class,
all too busy and desperately clutching on to their survival, or seeking
their diaspora or dreaming their greener pasture? The poor, who have
long ago accepted the hopelessness of dreaming for a future, surviving
on a belief "na hindi naman kami papabayaan na Diyos"?
And the corrupt?
Makakapal ang mukha nang mga iyan. Hindi na tinatalaban ng hiya. They
know too well how to survive and outlast these periods of public censure
and short bursts of outrage. Deny, whitewash, spin. Deny, whitewash,
spin. For soon enough, ZTE or the latest KKK will become ho-hum and
forgotten ingredients in the alphabet soup of corruption.
Yet,
we continue to yearn, hope and clamor for change, albeit, with small
measures of dissent, seasonal Edsa-inspired February protests, and pens
that occasionally catch fire and inspire.
And
we must continue to hope.
We
must ponder the solutions?
And. . . we must
ask: Do we have the collective will? Is there anything left in the Filipino's
dwindled capacity for change?
The
solutions?
Violent revolution?
I have listened to the impassioned hopelessness of some who believe
that change is possible only through a violent upheaval, with a coalition
of the bourgeoisie and the military, backing a "chosen" leader
with the balls to shoot the perpetrators in a public plaza and mercilessly
hack away at the many-headed beast of corruption that has for so long
been raping this motherland.
Well, that makes
for a good night of testosterone- and alcohol-fueled jingoistic conversation,
and assuredly, an entertainingly heated debate choosing the cast of
revolutionaries—trapos, pseudo-heroes, closeted and out-of-the
closet megalomaniacs, self-proclaimed angels of change—who will
star in this dream team of a revolution that has the longevity of a
hangover.
Prayer
Power?
I got that in an email. "Prayer Power: the ultimate and final solution."
Wow! . . . May laban ba ang prayer power sa corruption?. In some medieval
past, the Church sent out a Crusade to recover the Holy Land from the
Muslims. Uh uh. . . Prayer power is not going to do it. The war against
corruption will need something more proactive than that. And there's
no Lady of Change with her miracle waiting in the wing.
No, neither a
violent upheaval nor prayer power. Nor another EDSA or another kudeta
attempt.
But
it will take a revolution. .
.
a revolution of the middle class. . a revolution of the its collective
will and psyche, believing in bringing about change through the aegis
and mechanisms of democracy.
We
must believe change is possible.
. .
then, ponder and ask if we have the collective will. For
the revolution will demand of us commitment and sacrifice, into the
myriad ways we can contribute, small and large, short-term and long-term,
that can bring honor and shame back into our lives, and "passion"
back into our souls, to set into motion a collective effort that can
help bring about that urgent and desperate change, or a direction of
change that will be our worthwhile legacy to inspire and burden the
younger generations with.
Free and Honest
Elections.
Recently,
quite carried away ranting about the corrupt politicians, a young man
admonished me:
Why are you so negative? That is why we have elections.
I almost laughed at his naivete, but ended up pondering
his wisdom and his faith. For indeed, despite the oxymoron of"
free and honest elections" in this country, therein lies a solution.
For if the country can mobilize an effort, with a commitment from government
and private institutions, with political reforms that will ensure free
and honest elections, that can convince the jaded electorate to believe
in the process again, that their votes can count, to seat into public
office a new generation and breed of politicians and public servants
that will commit to change, then we might be able to embark on a new
road of consciousness, political cleansing and change.
Indeed,
this is a flawed democracy, orchestrated by severely entrenched core
systems of oligarchy and perpetuating corrupt political rules. But scattered
censure and outrage have already seen the toppling of local political
dynasties. Many are excited about what happened in Pampanga, some seeing
it as proof positive for the possibility of change. Perhaps, the Panlilio
syndrome is contagious. And I believe that there are many more men and
women out there who can be drawn to politics for the public service
and love of country, rather than the promise of power, personal gain,
and plunder.
Education
Change will be fueled by different engines working in unison. Education
is the one of those engines, in its forefront position in the assault
on corruption. Alas, education, too, has suffered by the hands of government
neglect and political avarice with the all too familiar skimming and
kickbacks. Underpaid and overburdened, many unable to pass licensure
exams, the past decades have seen a continuing decline of the education
system, beset by the continuing "padrino" system, the desperate
survival exodus of teachers. The house of education is in crisis and
in dismal disrepair. If it is to assume its critical role in the process
of change and rebirth, it has to be fixed, infused with long awaited
changes and inspire teachers to join in the mission of education, to
draw the masses away from their deepening belief that this is all we
can be and this is our awful destiny.
Education
for the select and burgis
The sad reality is that only a small and select segment of the children
can avail of the education that is
the privelege of the rich and the sponsored. So many are consigned to
substandard education, tragically compounded by the diminishing cumulative
education of family units.
Whence
the teachers?
Despite Teacher Education being the second most popular college program,
there continues to be a worsening shortage
of teachers. There is a dismal passing rate on the Licensure exam. Many
go to greener pastures to teach. Many are forced to find non-teaching
jobs, some to work as maids. Where
to find an infusion of skilled teachers?
The
returning diaspora
Sa totoo, ang daming nating matitinik. Thousands are coming back, in
droves of early retirement—professionals who have excelled in
their fields of endeavor: scientists, doctors, nurses, engineers and
many others with a sundry of practical skills. And so many more, lingering
in the diaspora of their choice, free from material want, dreaming and
hoping for change in their motherland. They could be asked to commit
a year or two to a school or town of their choice, to share their knowledge
or teach their skill. And if teaching is not in their thing, perhaps
they can dig into their deep pockets and support a student through college.
Imagine if this incredible untapped educational resource can be inspired
to join in a crusade of change. Imagine from this, a Peace Corp Philippines.
Imagine. . . just imagine.
And
a rule of law
A "rule of law" is essential to change. Without this, change
will flounder. And alas, the law often bends to the will of the rich
and powerful.
The
institutions of corruption are so entrenched. The corrupt will not give
it up. It is something that has to be taken away from them. There are
solutions, short-term and long-term, simple and complex. The many problems
that beset us are so intertwined with and consequent to the corruption
that plagues.
When,
the change?
Where, the heroes?
When, the change?
To
say: "Not in our lifetime" is to leave behind a terrible
legacy that will consign to the younger generations the burden of change.
To do nothing would ensure our continuing decline as a nation, mired
in corruption, shackled by indifference. Certainly,
we can survive another decade or generation of this, but
along the way, in that passage of time, we will further lose much of
ourselves, what
remains of our passion and will, and eventually, lose our capacity to
hope.
Where,
the heroes?
No Rizal, no Aguinaldo, no Bonifacio in this revolution.
But if such a change can come about, it will need many heroes, from
our midst, from the middle class, from the diaspora—teachers,
leaders, and volunteers who will commit, dedicate and sacrifice for
change, in a massive and collective endeavor and a thousand and one
grass root efforts that will draw people out of their shells of apathy
and resignation, inspire the masa out of their helplessness and hopelessness,
bridge together the thousands of islands and break down the barriers
of regionalism and shatter the foundations of corruption.
We want change.
But do we have the machinery for change?
Do we have the collective will to achieve the change?
What are we willing to give, commit and sacrifice?
Godofredo Umali Stuart |